Rock Deformation

Brittle Processes




Rocks that deform by fracturing are known as brittle materials (Figure 1 B). For a given loading rate, brittle processes tend to occur at relatively high shear stress and low confining stress (that is, low effective mean stress). In brittle materials, the peak differential stress at the onset of fracturing is called the compressive strength (Figure 1 B).

Peak differential stresses
Figure 1: Peak differential stresses

Modes of Fracture

The field of fracture mechanics recognizes three modes of fracture development in elastic solids (Figure 2).

Modes of fracture
Figure 2: Modes of fracture

Examples of Modes of Fracture

  • Mode 1

Mode 1 tensile fractures develop in response to stress applied normal to the resulting fracture plane. There is no shear displacement across the resulting fracture plane. Two examples of mode 1 fractures are rock joints (Figure 3) and hydraulic fractures initiated in a wellbore.

Example of mode 1 fracture: Joint fractures
Figure 3: Example of mode 1 fracture: Joint fractures
  • Mode 2

Mode 2 is a shear fracture that develops when a shear stress is applied in the plane of the resulting fracture; in this case the fracture propagates in the direction of applied shear stress (Figure 4).

Example of mode 2 fracture: Normal fault
Figure 4: Example of mode 2 fracture: Normal fault
  • Mode 3

Mode 3 fracture also results from shear stress applied in the plane of the resulting fracture; in this case the fracture propagates perpendicular to the applied shear stress (Figure 5).

Example of mode 3 fracture: San Andreas Fault
Figure 5: Example of mode 3 fracture: San Andreas Fault




Shear fractures form when the maximum shear stress in the rock exceeds a critical value called the shear strength or compressive strength. Figure 6 shows the general relationship between the three principal stresses and the shear fracture plane. Geologic faults and shear fractures are natural examples of mode 2 fractures. Mode 3 fractures would include faults and shear fractures that also included oblique movement.

Shear fracture plane
Figure 6: Shear fracture plane

The difference between a shear facture and a fault is the magnitude of shear displacement along the shear plane. From a mechanical standpoint the origins are the same.

Tensile Failure Criterion

Tensile fractures form when a normal stress exceeds the rock tensile strength, −T_0.

\sigma _n = −T_0

On a Mohr diagram the tensile failure criterion is the locus of points corresponding to a negative normal stress equal in magnitude to T_0 (Figure 7).

Coulomb Shear Failure Criterion

The Coulomb shear failure criterion describes how rock shear strength increases with increases in the least principal stress (that is, confining stress). This dependence of the critical shear stress on confining stress is one of the most fundamental aspects of rock strength, and is common to all rock failure criteria. The intermediate principal stress affects rock strength but it is of secondary importance (Mogi, 1967).

18th century French naturalist Charles Coulomb developed the first quantitative description of rock shear strength. The Coulomb failure criterion is:

|\tau| = S_0 +\mu \, \sigma _n

Where:

\tau is the maximum shear stress or shear strength

S_0 is the cohesive strength of the material

\mu is the coefficient of internal friction

\sigma _n is the normal stress acting on the potential plane of failure




The Coulomb criterion plots as a straight line on the Mohr diagram with constant slope \mu and a \tau intercept at S_0 (Figure 8). Both \mu and S_0 are empirical parameters that are dependent on the rock’s mineral composition and texture. Both parameters are routinely measured in the laboratory and can be estimated from geophysical measurements.

The Coulomb criterion
Figure 8: The Coulomb criterion

Mohr Shear Failure Criterion

Mohr generalized Coulomb’s failure theory by stating that strength is a function of stress and is often referred to as the Mohr-Coulomb theory.

\sigma _f = f(\sigma)

The Coulomb criterion is a special case of the Mohr criterion. Extensive laboratory testing of rock strength has demonstrated that the shear failure envelope often is a concave downward curve. A good example of such a concave downward failure envelope is the Hoek-Brown criterion. As a consequence, the friction angle is not a constant but deceases with increasing mean stress.

Amonton’s Law of Friction

Photomicrographs, rock outcrops, borehole imagery, and 3D seismic data all show that most rock masses contain planes of weakness. Under certain conditions, shear displacement is possible at grain-to-grain contacts or on bedding planes, fracture planes, or along faults.

Figure 9 illustrates planes of weakness in contact.

Shear displacement on fractures vs. grain contact—large-scale fractures and faults (A), small-scale inter-particle contacts (B)
Figure 9: Shear displacement on fractures vs. grain contact—large-scale fractures and faults (A), small-scale inter-particle contacts (B)

Movement between two surfaces in contact is resisted by frictional forces. This frictional resistance is governed by Amonton’s Law (Figure 10):

F_{fric} = \mu \, F_n

Where:

F_{fric}[latex] is the force exerted by each material on the other <!-- /wp:paragraph -->  <!-- wp:paragraph --> [latex]F_n is the normal force acting perpendicular to the surfaces in contact

\mu is the coefficient of sliding friction




Amonton's Law
Figure 10: Amonton’s Law

Expressed in terms of stresses, Amonton’s Law can be written as:

\tau = \mu \, \sigma _n

Where:

\tau is the shear stress on a plane of weakness

\sigma _n is the normal stress acting on the planes in contact

\mu is the coefficient of sliding friction

Amonton’s Law plots as a straight line on the Mohr diagram with slope \mu. Notice that the intercept is \tau=0 (Figure 11). Once a shear fracture has formed or a plane of weakness exists, the maximum shear stress that the weakened rock mass can withstand is only governed by friction.

Amonton's Law represented on the Mohr circle
Figure 11: Amonton’s Law represented on the Mohr circle

The symbol \mu appears in the Coulomb failure criterion and in Amonton’s Law; however, the physical interpretation and the numerical values are not the same. Terminology common in geomechanics, rock mechanics, and geophysics uses ϕ as the angle of internal friction, to characterize the dependence of intact rock strength on pressure and \mu as the coefficient of sliding friction, to characterize the frictional strength of surfaces in contact.

Referring to Figure 9:

\mu = \tan \phi

The Coulomb criterion expressed in terms of the internal friction angle is:

|\tau| = S_0 + \sigma _n\, \tan \phi



About PETRO SHINE

Check Also

The Mechanical Earth Model, Geomechanics, Geomechanical model, geomechanical properties, Building geomechanical models

Mechanical Earth Model | What is a mechanical earth model?

Discover the Mind-Blowing Mechanical Earth Model That Will Revolutionize Your Understanding! Prepare to be Amazed!