ad
Geomechanics
Trending

Mechanical Earth Model | What is a mechanical earth model?

Sources of Data for Mechanical Earth Model




Data sources are presented in the order that information evolves in a new prospect.

  • Geological data
  • Seismic data
  • Drilling data
  • Borehole measurements
  • Rock samples

Geological Data for Mechanical Earth Model

Geologic data establish regional or basin-scale constraints on the geomechanical model. Of particular interest are the tectonic history, basin burial history, and regional stratigraphic correlations. Much of this general information can be found in scientific journals. More site-specific information is found in company reports and in publically available offset well data. Table 1 shows how certain geologic data contribute to the geomechanical model.

Framework
Model
Mechanical
Stratigraphy
Mechanical
Properties
Pore
Pressure
Principal
Stresses
Stress
Directions
Burial
history
   ✔ ✔  
Tectonic
history
 ✔    ✔ ✔
3D geologic
model
 ✔ ✔    
Earthquake fault
plane solutions
     ✔ ✔
World stress
map
      ✔
Basin
model
  ✔ ✔ ✔  
Stratigraphic
column
  ✔ ✔   
Depositional environment  ✔ ✔   
Core
description
  ✔ ✔   
Table 1: Mechanical Earth Model Components from Geologic Data

Seismic Data for Mechanical Earth Model

Surface seismic data provide structural and rock property information over the entire volume of interest. Seismic data are important for four reasons.

  • Seismic data often provide the only elastic property data in the uppermost kilometer of depth. This is a particularly important zone in deepwater settings.
  • Seismic data reveal the spatial distribution of rock elastic properties. Interpretation of these properties defines trends in gross lithology, porosity, and pore pressure.
  • Seismic data provide the only measurements below the reservoir level. Such data are needed when constructing 3D and 4D geomechanical models.
  • A pre-drill MEM constrained by geologic and seismic data is calibrated using check shot and logging while drilling (LWD) velocity data acquired while drilling exploration wells.




Table 2 shows how seismic data contributes to the geomechanical model.

Framework ModelMechanical StratigraphyMechanical PropertiesPore PressurePrincipal StressesStress DirectionsSeismic
Data
 ✔     3D Seismic
cube
 ✔     2D seismic
profiles
 ✔ ✔    Formation
tops
 ✔ ✔    ✔Structural
interpretation
  ✔    Sequence
stratigraphy
  ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔AVO
analysis
   ✔ ✔ ✔ Tomographic
velocity model
 ✔ ✔  ✔ ✔ VSP
checkshot
Table 2: Mechanical Earth Model Components from Seismic Data

Drilling Data for Mechanical Earth Model

Drilling data from exploration wells provide the earliest quantitative information about subsurface rock formations. These data extend from earth’s surface to the base of the reservoir. The location of seismic reflectors, gross changes of lithology, and constraints on pore pressure can be found in the daily drilling reports. Frequent trips in and out of the hole provide information about the location and nature of rock deformation, failure mechanisms, and time-dependent behavior. Leakoff tests or formation integrity tests place constraints on principal stress magnitudes. Occasionally, large fragments of rock are transported to the surface in the drilling fluid or lodged in logging tools. These fragments, called cavings, provide evidence of rock failure mechanisms for a specific lithology. Often, cavings are large enough to supply samples for laboratory mechanical property tests. Table 3 shows how drilling data contribute to the geomechanical model.

Framework ModelMechanical StratigraphyMechanical PropertiesPore PressurePrincipal StressesStress DirectionsDrilling
Data
  ✔ ✔  ✔ Daily drilling
reports
  ✔ ✔   Daily geologic
reports
   ✔   Daily bit
reports
 ✔ ✔  ✔ ✔ End of well
reports
     ✔ Formation integrity
test
     ✔ Leakoff
test
     ✔ Extended leakoff
test
 ✔     Directional
surveys
Table 3: Mechanical Earth Model Components from Drilling Data

Borehole Measurements for Mechanical Earth Model

Logging while drilling (LWD) and wireline measurements provide high-resolution geophysical data from the near surface to the base of the reservoir. Deep reading LWD data are acquired in large hole sizes (17 1/4″) including gamma ray, resistivity, and  V_p . Additional measurements available in 12 1/4″ in diameter holes and smaller include: borehole images, bulk density, and  V_p and  V_s . LWD data are particularly valuable because they are less sensitive to wellbore instability and they can provide evidence of time-dependent deformation. Table 4 shows how borehole measurements contribute to the geomechanical model.

Framework ModelMechanical StratigraphyMechanical PropertiesPore PressurePrincipal StressesStress DirectionsBorehole
Data
 ✔✔  ✔ ✔  ✔Borehole
images
  ✔✔    GR
 
  ✔ ✔   Lithology
interpretation
    ✔ ✔ Oriented multi-arm
caliper
 ✔ ✔ ✔  ✔ Bulk
density
    ✔✔  Deep
Resistivity
  ✔  ✔✔  Monopole
 V_p ,  V_s
   ✔  ✔ Dipole fast & slow
 V_s
 ✔    ✔ Fast shear
azimuth
     ✔ Dipole dispersion
analysis
     ✔✔ Stress
measurement
   ✔ ✔  Formation
pressure
Table 4: Mechanical Earth Model Components from Borehole Data

Rock Samples for Mechanical Earth Model

Rock samples provide the ground truth for predictions about rock type and rock properties. Samples of rock, in one form or another, are available over the entire depth of a well. Table 5 describes the subsurface rocks and their sources.

TypeSpatial DomainTypical SizesDescription
CuttingsOverburden Reservoir \sim 1mmProduct of the drilling process
CavingsOverburden Reservoir1-20 cmProduct of wellbore instability
CoresReservoirDiam. 10-15 cm, L.  \sim 9 mConventional coring
Sidewall coresReservoirDiam. 2.5 cm, L.  \sim 8 cmRotary sidewall coring tool run on wireline
Table 5: Sources and Description of Subsurface Rock Samples

Drill Cuttings and Cavings

Drill cuttings record the lithostratigraphy of rocks penetrated by a well. However, one disadvantage shared by cuttings and cavings samples is that their depth of origin is often not well known. Subsequent log interpretation can constrain the depth of origin, however.




Rotary Coring

Rotary coring is the main source of rock samples large enough for laboratory study. Conventional coring uses a core barrel deployed on drill pipe. Cores provide a continuous, typically undisturbed, record of rock over the cored interval within a reservoir. Whole cores are most suitable for rock mechanical property tests because they are large enough to provide multiple test samples with different orientations relative to bedding.

Rotary Sidewall Cores

Rotary sidewall cores are available using wireline tools. Sidewall cores are typically about 2.5 cm in diameter and 5 cm in length. Unlike conventional rotary coring, the axis of sidewall cores is perpendicular to the well axis. The precise depth and azimuth of the sidewall cores can be determined from analysis of borehole images.

An advantage of sidewall cores is that they can target specific formations of interest identified using previously acquired wireline logs. Another advantage is that many samples can be acquired over a large depth range on a single trip into the well. Rock mechanical properties are obtained on sidewall cores using the multistage test protocol. Testing horizontal plugs provides sufficient mechanical property data if it is assumed that the rock is isotropic. If the rock is anisotropic the mechanical data will be incomplete but still useful. Table 6 shows how rock samples contribute to the geomechanical model.

Framework ModelMechanical StratigraphyMechanical PropertiesPore PressurePrincipal StressesStress DirectionsRock Sample Data
  ✔    Drill cuttings
  ✔✔    Cavings
✔  ✔✔    Whole core
  ✔ ✔   Sidewall cores
Table 6: Mechanical Earth Model Components from Rock Sample Data
Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6Next page

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ad
Back to top button